|
School's Evaluation of the Program
Contract Summary
Evaluation Summary
 |
| Evaluator: |
Melissa Kambouras, Art in Education VP
|
| Grades: |
K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
| Dates: |
11/25/2025 |
| Submitted: |
12/1/2025 1:12:48 PM |
|
Ratings
|
Rating System: 1-5 points: 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=very good; 5=outstanding
|
4 |
Artistic Quality of Presentation
Artist demonstrated skill and dedication to their art; repertoire was appropriate and well-chosen for students' age and interest levels; art form was presented in an enjoyable, artistic manner. |
5 |
Artist's Interaction with Students
Artist effectively engaged students in the program; artist listened to student comments/questions and responded appropriately. |
4 |
Educational Quality of Presentation
Artist helped students to understand this art form and the creative process; artist demonstrated relationships between art form and other curriculum areas; artists helped children to see/hear with greater discrimination; artist used vocabulary terms that were within the grasp of students. |
5 |
Student Response to Presentation
Artist engaged students' interest and attention; applause and laughter was genuine and enthusiatic; restlessness was minimal; when invited to participate, students were eager; questions to artists indicated that students understood the presentation. |
4 |
Quality of Presentation
Speakers could be easily heard; performers could be seen; lighting, props and sound effects were effective; costumes were imaginative, colorful and appropriate; elements of surprise and humor were included in presentation; program was well-paced; program began and ended on time. |
Not Provided
|
Study Guides/Support Materials
Please enter your comments below regarding: a) whether or not materials were provided to schools before the performance; b) whether or not these were provided in a timely manner; c) whether or not they were useful to teachers in preparing the students |
|
Would you recommend this program to other school districts?
Yes
Yes, the program was fun and engaging.
Suggestions to artists for improvement:
Students that rolled the dice did not actually do anything and their "task" seems irrelevant to the game. These students that were chosen to roll the dice then sat on a square and were not able to volunteer to participate in the activities. Many students wanted to be involved in the actual game, but only a handful of students were able to actually "play" the games. I would like to see more students being involved. Also, the artist could have talked more about teamwork and working together.
Please include any additional comments you care to make.
Artist was supposed to arrive at 8:30am for set up. Show time was scheduled to begin at 9:30am. Artist arrived at 9:30am. It was difficult to initially get in touch with the artist even though her phone number was provided to me. Artist finally contacted me at 9am to let me know they were going to be late.
|
