|
School's Evaluation of the Program
Contract Summary
Evaluation Summary
 |
| Evaluator: |
Lauren schneidman, ap willts pta chair
|
| Grades: |
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
| Dates: |
4/7/2024 |
| Submitted: |
4/7/2024 7:09:47 PM |
|
Ratings
|
Rating System: 1-5 points: 1=poor; 2=fair; 3=good; 4=very good; 5=outstanding
|
3 |
Artistic Quality of Presentation
Artist demonstrated skill and dedication to their art; repertoire was appropriate and well-chosen for students' age and interest levels; art form was presented in an enjoyable, artistic manner. |
3 |
Artist's Interaction with Students
Artist effectively engaged students in the program; artist listened to student comments/questions and responded appropriately. |
3 |
Educational Quality of Presentation
Artist helped students to understand this art form and the creative process; artist demonstrated relationships between art form and other curriculum areas; artists helped children to see/hear with greater discrimination; artist used vocabulary terms that were within the grasp of students. |
3 |
Student Response to Presentation
Artist engaged students' interest and attention; applause and laughter was genuine and enthusiatic; restlessness was minimal; when invited to participate, students were eager; questions to artists indicated that students understood the presentation. |
3 |
Quality of Presentation
Speakers could be easily heard; performers could be seen; lighting, props and sound effects were effective; costumes were imaginative, colorful and appropriate; elements of surprise and humor were included in presentation; program was well-paced; program began and ended on time. |
|
Would you recommend this program to other school districts?
Yes
Suggestions to artists for improvement:
Please include any additional comments you care to make.
|
